Joshua 16-18
At the end
of this document there is a map from the Bible Knowledge Commentary OT,
p. 358, showing where the tribes were placed in the land.
It says in
Joshua and Judges that the people obeyed until the last of the elders who
served with Joshua had died. This means that the two references you will find
saying that the Canaanites were not driven out, but put into forced labor were
written later as historical notes, possibly by Samuel, the last of the judges.
Joshua 16
Vs. 1-4
Next came the tribes of Joseph. In Genesis 48 it seems that Jacob gives the
blessing of Abraham and firstborn blessing to Ephraim. Yet, God decided that
Judah was the honored tribe. You’d think that everyone would have been jealous
of the huge amount of land given to Judah, but some of it was the worst land.
The south was desert and wilderness and there were very fierce enemies. God
gave the hardest territory to the tribe with the godliest leader. In a manner
of speaking, I think He still does that today. Opposition is given to those who
can bring it before God, fight in prayer and perseverance, and still prosper in
the harvest.
Vs. 5-10
This is the territory given to Ephraim. Notice v. 10. Now, it does say in 15:63
that the tribe of Judah wasn’t able to drive out the Jebusites in Jerusalem. I
think God had a purpose in that and Jerusalem was a fortified city. Actually,
we’ll see that Jerusalem was also in the territory of Benjamin (18:28). The big
difference between that comment about Judah and this one about Ephraim is
obvious. Ephraim had the opportunity to win, but instead of sending these
people into God’s presence, they put them to forced labor. Ephraim wasn’t
tricked into making a covenant with the Canaanites; they just disobeyed, using
the situation with the Gibeonites as a precedent. This was for their own
convenience and economic prosperity. I’m sure there were also soft-hearted,
humanitarian arguments.
Joshua 17
Vs. 1-2
Now we get to Joseph’s other son, Manasseh.
Vs. 3-6
This shows the fulfillment of the situation with the daughters of Zelophehad.
This is the fourth time these women and this situation has been mentioned. It
will be mentioned one more time in 1 Chronicles 7. It seems to me that God is
making a point of what happened here. Not only did God protect the inheritance
of Zelophehad, but He laid out the precedent of extending these rights to
women. Based on what happened here, thousands of other situations could be
determined. God’s heart was known and it was written in Israel’s law. That’s
kind of nice of God to do that.
Vs. 7-13
This is the land division for Manasseh. You notice v. 13. Again, this was added
later, after the fact. This is absolutely tragic and it is exactly what God
told the people not to do. We are getting ready for the darkness that is the
book of Judges.
Vs. 14-18
This story is also very foreboding. I don’t know if there is an intentional
contrast to Judah and Caleb, but there is a definite difference in the tone of
this request and Caleb’s request. There is no faith visible in the people of
Joseph, only whining. In vs. 15 and 17, Joshua tells them they were able to do
this from the standpoint of power, but they didn’t have the faith.
Notice that
the people are already making excuses for not driving the people out. It is
almost as if God has done the big work through Joshua, and now "the
disciples" have to live by their own faith. Tragic as it is, left to their
own faith and their own initiative to seek after God, they failed; not because
God failed, but left to themselves, they really had no faith, or, to use one of
Jesus’ parables, they had no root in themselves.
Joshua 18
V. 1 In
the Bible Knowledge Commentary-OT, pp. 360-361, Donald Campbell links
the tone of the people of Joseph to the move Joshua makes here to establish the
tabernacle in Shiloh. The people were worn out and becoming fearful. They would
now have to follow and obey by faith and there were already signs that they
were beginning to fail. This is the first mention of Shiloh. Apparently they
set up camp there, and that is where the tabernacle was for about 300 years,
until the ark was lost to the Philistines during the lifetime of Samuel.
Vs. 2-10
This is pretty interesting how they decided to divvy up the rest of the land.
You can sense again in v. 3 that there was a reluctance of the people to
joyfully strike out and take the land that God had already shown He would give
them. You wonder too, if the other tribes felt bad because so much was given to
Judah, Manasseh and Ephraim. Notice that it is mentioned again that the Levites
were given no inheritance of land. The land divisions were made by these roving
surveyors, but the seven areas that they made were allotted to each tribe by
God at Shiloh. The lots being cast were probably the Urim and Thummim.
Vs. 11-28
This is the land given to Benjamin, on the northern boundary of Judah.
Eventually, Judah and Benjamin would become the southern kingdom. Though Simeon
is given land, like a bubble, in the middle of Judah, they will move to fertile
lands up north. When the kingdom splits, the northern kingdom will be ten
tribes and Judah will actually be Judah and Benjamin.
Of note
here is the mention of Jerusalem also belonging to Benjamin (and apparently
also to Judah). Also, notice Gibeah in v. 28. This city is the center of a
tragic story at the end of Judges. It is the first city of Israel to go
“Sodom,” and in the civil war that follows, the entire tribe of Benjamin will
be reduced to 600 men.
Luke 19:1-27
I've never
noticed this before, but it seems that all of this takes place at Zacchaeus'
house. Jesus had told His disciples that you had to receive the kingdom like a
child. So in Jericho we’ve met Bartimaeus, crying out and, once healed,
bounding around Jesus, following Him. Now we’ll see a contrast to the rich,
young ruler. We’ll see a rich man who is saved, and again, acts like a kid.
Vs. 1-10
It is interesting that just recently, God brought Jesus into contact with the
rich young ruler. Here, you have a tax collector. He was rich and he hadn't
been a completely honest guy (since he had people to pay back), but he was
repentant and willing to give everything away for the sake of knowing Jesus.
Funny how the religious young ruler backed away from Jesus, but the sinner was
ready to follow.
Vs. 4-6
Again, you have childlike faith to the point of climbing trees and bounding
around in joy. Notice that this is the second story in a row of someone willing
to "seek" Jesus and to endure shame for doing it. Zacchaeus, like the
blind man, wasn't blind to who Jesus was.
V. 7 I’ll
bet you don’t have to guess who “they” were.
Notice,
too, that over half of the story has to do with Zacchaeus seeking Jesus. The
remainder of the story is the proof of his sincerity and salvation. Jesus
didn't have to ask Zacchaeus to give anything because he was already ready to
do so.
V. 9
Zacchaeus wasn’t saved by doing what he did, but like the test to the rich
young ruler, the willingness to give stuff away proved that his treasure was in
heaven and that money didn't own his heart like it did the rich young ruler’s.
V. 10 I
read today, "A disciple is not above his teacher….it is enough that a
disciple is like his teacher…." If this was why Jesus came and it expresses
His passion, we too should be living to seek and to save what is lost.
Vs. 11-27
Luke tells us why Jesus is telling this parable here. This story is similar,
but not the same as the parable of the talents that Jesus will tell in
Jerusalem the Wednesday before He dies. You probably have a note telling you
how much a "mina" was. That would be a hefty amount.
In light
of the purpose of the story, what was Jesus trying to get across to the Twelve
and to the others who were following Him? Everyone was hoping He was about to
overthrow the Roman government and bring the religious corruption to an end
(everyone knew the chief priests were no good).
For us as
disciples, there is an application. We are entrusted with something. There also
seems to be variable rewards based on fruit. Fruit is relative and all fruit is
rewarded. Fruitlessness is not celebrated here. It seems that the lack of
trying was the real issue. Is it fair to say that if someone has been
"given" forgiveness and grace, they will see it as their mission to
see that forgiveness and grace is "invested" in the lives of others
who have not found it?
V. 26 This
saying has been used by Jesus often, particularly in training His disciples. It
is almost like He's saying, "use it or lose it." It might be like
saying that a truly believing person will strive to understand and bear
testimony to Christ, whereas a "professing" but lost person will not
strive or be passionate about making their life count for Christ.
V. 27
These are the general masses who didn't want this man to rule over them. It
seems that the servant who didn't engage in business for his master could be
one of those who didn't really want his master to return. I find it hard to
accept Jesus applying the words, wicked
and condemn to a disciple in v. 22.
On the other hand, if this parable is being applied to unbelievers, I can't see
Jesus entrusting them with His truth, if that's what the mina means. We know
from 1 Corinthians 3:15 that there will be a "test by fire" for
disciples to see what they have built on the foundation of their faith and
God's truth. My view here is that the wicked
servant is a real believer who will be tested by fire and will find that
everything he built in this life got burned away. That person in 1 Corinthians
will enter heaven and live eternally, but he will enter heaven with shame as he
meets the Lord he has let down and sees that his life for Christ was a sham.
The point
for me here is, Engage in business until
I come. Amen.
Psalm 87
This is a
very interesting psalm. Basically it says that Zion (Jerusalem) is not only
God's city, but will someday be the great city of the world.
Rahab
stands for Egypt and Babylon is Iraq, both places where God led Israel. These
two nations hosted Israel and will apparently be blessed for that, and with
these other nations mentioned here, will someday be adopted and included in
Israel's worship as part of Israel. It will be said that they were born in
Zion. Verse 6 says the same thing. The Lord will include them in the register
of those who have been “born in Zion,” belonging to the blessing of that
kingdom. This all sounds like a fulfillment of the promise to Abraham that all
nations would be blessed through him. Also, since this event has never happened
to this point in history, I'd say it is referring to the Millennial Kingdom,
where Jesus will rule the world from Jerusalem for 1000 years.
Notice
that v. 3 gave birth to a song, a hymn, "Glorious Things of Thee are
Spoken, Zion, City of our God." Imagine my surprise when we moved to
Germany and, watching a soccer game, discovered the melody of that hymn is the
melody of Germany's national anthem.
V. 7 In
the future, all joy will spring from that city, its river of healing and its
King.
Proverbs 13:11
I guess
the stories we have of lottery winners being ruined by their quick wealth bears
this out. The real virtue here is steady diligence in work, rather than chasing
after wealth, fame or success. I think this also goes for working in the
harvest, growing disciples and building churches that labor in the harvest,
making disciples, who make disciples, who make disciples.
If you’re reading along and don’t have a One Year
Bible, click on this link http://www.esvbible.org/devotions/every-day-in-the-word/. If that doesn't
work, go to http://www.esvbible.org/devotions/
and click on “Every
Day in the Word.”
I'm writing these comments to and for those who are
following a One Year Bible and interested in growing deeper as a disciple,
following Jesus in the harvest. My hope is to see the growth of a discipleship
culture in the church. Groups of 3-4 disciples, meeting weekly, encouraging
each other to follow Christ and work to reach out and make disciples who make
disciples. The Bible itself is the most universal manual we have and key to our
growth and service in Christ. Nothing keeps us more focused on why we are here
or what we are to be doing. My comments are only meant to provide some
explanation of the events or to show the flow of God's plan of redemption. My
comments are in no way exhaustive, but are designed to keep us focused on
Christ and our role in His harvest. My hope is that the people in these groups
will grow in Christ and be willing, after a year, to find 3 others to meet with
and encourage in their growth as disciples, disciples making disciples in the
harvest.
If you would like a complete description of this model
of being and making disciples you can find it in my book: Simply
Disciples*Making Disciples. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B011WJIDQA?*Version*=1&*entries*=0
If you would like a more descriptive commentary that is
still readable and concise, I'd recommend the Bible Knowledge Commentary. It's
keyed to the NIV, so the result is the commentators are constantly telling you
what the Greek or Hebrew is. That never hurts.
I am not endorsing any particular One Year Bible; in
fact, I read something you don't, die revidierte Lutherbibel 1984.
Anyone reading along with us is welcome to do so and is
encouraged to take their own notes and make their own observations. If the
comments made do not agree with your particular tradition or understanding,
that's OK. Nothing I've written is meant to criticize any point of view, but
only to express the truth of what God has written to us, as I understand it.
Send comments or feedback to dgkachikis@gmail.com.
If you would like documents containing an entire month
of the Reading Notes, go to https://sites.google.com/site/dlkachikis/reading-notes. You can download
these to use on your computer or to print.
No comments:
Post a Comment