1 Kings 2:1-3:3
1 Kings 2
Vs. 1-4 While I think it good for David to tell Solomon to follow the Lord and His Word (v. 3), I think verse 4 has too much emphasis on David’s lineage and keeping the throne. It is really hard to say how much of God’s plan of redemption was grasped by David and others. In observing David, it seems that he became a little dysfunctional regarding his sons, first thinking it would be Amnon, then Absalom, etc… I would feel better if I saw something about the glory of God and the testimony of Israel to the nations. When we see Solomon dedicate the temple, many of his words have to do with himself.
As disciples, it is only by God’s grace that we can see God’s plan so clearly. Matthew 13:17 Truly, I say to you, many prophets and righteous men longed to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it. We are living on the cutting edge of God’s plan. We have all this history to observe and we have the record of the lives of all these men and women who played a part in His plan without knowing or grasping what we take for granted. For us then, our work as disciples can’t have anything to do with a name we leave behind in a church or a group. Our heritage and joy is in the name of Christ and sharing what He has done. We work in the harvest, reaching out and making disciples for His name, not ours.
Vs. 5-9 I’ve alluded to David’s final instructions to Solomon. You might have though with his closeness to God and the benefit of the Urim and Thummim, David would have figured out what to do with Joab as he committed these crimes. Somehow I don’t think this speaks well of David. To me, David allowed too much injustice and deception in those close to him, probably to build a kingdom, and probably because it reminded him too much of his own sins. As disciples, I would say it is better to be honest at all times and trust God for the results even if it means confessing our sins or not allowing others to “get away with murder,” even if they are a key player in a church or organization.
This isn’t the full story on David’s final instructions to Solomon. On a better note, in I Chronicles, we’ll see David pass on instructions, materials and blueprints to Solomon for the building of the temple.
Vs. 13-25 This is really Solomon cleaning up after David. David, unlike Ahithophel, didn’t set his house in order when he died. He allowed this situation with Adonijah to grow out of his neglect.
The issue here was that Adonijah wanted Abishag so he could marry her and use this as a way to claim the right to the throne. Legally, according to the Law, he couldn’t marry his father’s wife, but because David had had no sexual relationship with her, it might not have been considered a full marriage. Whether it was legal or not is not the point. Solomon saw through the plan and knew who the planners were.
V. 24 It seems to me that there are a lot of “me”s going on in this statement.
V. 25 This is one of David’s mighty men who became David’s bodyguard. Now he is Solomon’s hatchet man.
Vs. 26-27 Solomon didn’t kill Abiathar because he was a priest. No one from this lineage would ever serve as priest again. Note that Jeremiah was from Anathoth, and was a really good guy.
Vs. 28-35 Now it is Joab’s turn. Joab might have thought that grasping the horns of the altar would save him and that Solomon wouldn’t have the nerve to do this. Joab should have died long ago. He had brought poison into David’s court, but David is to blame.
Vs. 33 This seems a little self aggrandizing to me. God should receive glory and the truth of His Word should be lifted high.
Vs. 36-46 The final loose end is Shimei. Solomon knew something would happen to make him leave Jerusalem.
In both situations, God was sovereign and removed two potential treats to Solomon. If Adonijah, Abiathar and Joab hadn’t tried this idea with Abishag, they might have gone to the grave in peace. If Shimei had stayed in Jerusalem and let someone else find his slaves, nothing would have happened. Solomon didn’t have to press the issue with these men. He only needed to wait on the Lord.
1 Kings 3:1-3
There is all sorts of foreboding here.
Why did Solomon make an alliance with Egypt, especially through marriage? Israel had been warned that if they allowed their sons to marry women who worshiped other gods, these women would eventually turn their hearts. What was he thinking? Why didn’t Solomon depend on a sovereign God for peace? Why does God seem so silent here? Did Solomon consult the Lord? Did he roll the Urim and Thummim? I doubt it. I guess there is a liability for being too smart and too “wise.”
V. 3 You will see this “only” often among the kings. I think Josiah is the only one who put an end to this. Again, later, Solomon will, himself, sacrifice to foreign gods on these and other high places. It was forbidden in the Law to offer anywhere besides the Tabernacle. A wise king, blessed by God, could have put an end to that and drawn the people to worship as God had intended. God’s silence doesn’t mean His approval.
As disciples, we see that some of the little tendencies of these men of God became huge failures later and led them, and others, into ruin. Organizationally, everyone has an opinion about things, but where the Word is crystal clear, we need to stay with the Word. No compromise. Personally, we need to look at ourselves too. Do we allow ourselves the luxury of committing little sins? Beware. We are no better than these men. It is better that we lay things aside now and focus on the harvest. Once our work is done and we’re in heaven, we’ll enjoy true vivid joy and enjoyment and we won’t miss what we thought we would miss here.
Acts 5
Vs. 1-11 The church was young, only weeks old. During this crucial beginning period of the church, God did something here, to protect the church, that, thankfully(?), He doesn’t do today.
Ananias and Sapphira had seen the reaction of the church leaders to Barnabas’ selfless sale of his property and his giving of the entire sum to the apostles. They wanted that kind of “fame” for themselves; to be known among the apostles and in the church. Their sin was not that they didn’t give all the money, but that they said they gave all the money, and really they sold it for more than they said and kept a good part of the proceeds for themselves. It was their claim that they were super-sacrificial, giving it all, to gain fame and importance in the church that was the sin.
V. 3 This verse is used to show (if necessary) the personhood and deity of the Spirit. You cannot lie to a “force,” you can only lie to a person. In verse four it says that lying to the Spirit is lying to God. The Holy Spirit is a Person, the third member of the Trinity.
V. 10 What would you think if your service for the Lord was burying disobedient Christians? You’d definitely have job security. Frankly, I hate digging holes.
V. 11 Fear in the church was the intended result. For now there was fear. That wouldn’t last and God wouldn’t keep striking down disobedient Christians. This was a special time.
Vs. 12-16 Notice that the church kept growing and that all of the apostles are doing signs and wonders. So I’m guessing the church was now at least a third of the population of Jerusalem. Many of the people who came to Christ who were there for Pentecost would return to their homes in the Gentile world.
Vs. 17-32 God was doing big things in a big way. What lessons for us do you see in all of this? Where did the disciples get their courage?
Isn’t it interesting that God broke them loose from prison and then sent them back into harm’s way?
Vs. 33-42 I just have a few observations here.
First, we haven’t heard this yet, but Gamaliel’s star pupil was the Pharisee Saul, soon to become the Apostle Paul.
V. 40 I find it cute that, to feel good about themselves, the leaders had to rough up the apostles.
Vs. 41-42 But the word around town was that the council wouldn’t do anything to them, therefore, they must be OK. Again, this is another example of Luke showing Theophilus and all of his readers, that the Jewish authorities had no real or legal complaint against the disciples or Christianity. In a sense the church was declared “not guilty.”
Psalm 125
In going to Jerusalem to worship, the direction is not given as north, south, east, or west. It is simply “up.” As the worshipers approached the rocky, defensible heights of the city surrounded by mountains, they thought of the Lord being the one on high, who protects and surrounds His people.
Proverbs 16:25
This is a very famous verse that I’ve used a lot in witnessing. The older people get, the more they either think they have it figured out or they figure it doesn’t matter if you figure it out. Without Jesus, the end is death.
If you’re reading along and don’t have a One Year Bible, click on this link Every Day in the Word. If that doesn't work, go to http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/devotions/ and click on “Every Day in the Word.”
I'm writing these comments to and for those who are following a One Year Bible and interested in growing deeper as a disciple, following Jesus in the harvest. My hope is to see the growth of a discipleship culture in the church. Groups of 3-4 disciples, meeting weekly, encouraging each other to follow Christ and work to reach out and make disciples who make disciples. The Bible itself is the most universal manual we have and key to our growth and service in Christ. Nothing keeps us more focused on why we are here or what we are to be doing. My comments are only meant to provide some explanation of the events or to show the flow of God's plan of redemption. My comments are in no way exhaustive, but are designed to keep us focused on Christ and our role in His harvest. My hope is that the people in these groups will grow in Christ and be willing, after a year, to find 3 others to meet with and encourage in their growth as disciples, disciples making disciples in the harvest.
If you would like a more descriptive commentary that is still readable and concise, I'd recommend the Bible Knowledge Commentary. It's keyed to the NIV, so the result is, the commentators are constantly telling you what the Greek or Hebrew is. That never hurts.
I am not endorsing any particular One Year Bible; in fact, I read something you don't, die revidierte Lutherbibel 1984.
Anyone reading along with us is welcome to do so and is encouraged to take their own notes and make their own observations. If the comments made do not agree with your particular tradition or understanding, that's OK. Nothing I've written is meant to criticize any point of view, but only to express the truth of what God has written to us, as I understand it.
No comments:
Post a Comment